Subgroup analyses may be misleading - Students 4 Best Evidence

Findings based on results for subgroups of people within a treatment comparison may be misleading. These analyses are often poorly planned and reported.

Prospect Theory: What It Is and How It Works, With Examples

Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review

Frontiers Providing Evidence for the Null Hypothesis in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Group-Level Bayesian Inference

The difference between a systematic review and a meta-analysis - Covidence

Understanding statistical significance of subgroups in the data science era - Research Outreach

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence on learning during the COVID-19 pandemic

Statistics in Medicine — Reporting of Subgroup Analyses in Clinical Trials

Heterogeneity in meta-analysis - Students 4 Best Evidence

A values-aligned intervention fosters growth mindset–supportive teaching and reduces inequality in educational outcomes